The Existence of Amicus Curiae in Constitutional Court Decisions: A Participation Theory Perspective

Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum; Muchamad Ali  Safa’at; Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo

doi:10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.429

Annisa Mayang Tyaningrum Universitas Brawijaya
Muchamad Ali Safa’at Universitas Brawijaya
Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Universitas Brawijaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v7i1.429

Keywords: Constitutional Court, Amicus curiae, Participation

Abstract

This study explores the role of amicus curiae in Constitutional Court decisions through participation theory, highlighting the importance of public involvement in legal decision-making. As a form of non-litigation participation, amicus curiae provides legal insights and diverse perspectives, aiding judges in balancing legal certainty, justice, and utility, particularly in cases of public significance. The research examines how amicus curiae aligns with participation theory and analyzes its influence on the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Using normative legal research, the findings reveal that amicus curiae enhances decision quality, transparency, and accountability while reflecting active public engagement. This mechanism underscores the Court's commitment to a democratic and inclusive legal system, making the role of amicus curiae both relevant and strategic in upholding constitutional justice.